Species-Being and State of Nature

While Aristotle conceives political organization as a 'natural' fulfilment of human interaction, Hobbes conceives the 'state of nature' to be a 'war of all against all', for which political organization is an extra-natural remedy.  Now, though Hobbes concept of Nature is sometimes traced to the English Civil War of the period, the thesis that grounds it is not historical, but Psychological--that the fundamental principle of motivation of each human is Egoistical, i. e. Self-Preservation, with universal war ad its consequence.  In sharp contrast, according to Darwinism, the 'state of nature' is primarily a property of a Species, involving processes such as Evolution, Surviving, and Adaptation, usually with respect to an environment.  Accordingly, the internal conditions of a Species, i. e.  the motivations and relations of its members, are derived from Species-processes and -conditions.  Thus, if members are motivated by Self-Preservation it can only be as an expression of a Species-Principle.  However, absent a self-destructive mode of the latter, a war of all against is impossible as a state of nature.  Hence, there is no need, as does Hobbes, to cast the remedy for an actual event such as the English Civil War as 'extra-natural'.