Dissonance, Will to Power, Repulsion, Attraction

On the basis of the centrality of Dissonance to Birth of Tragedy, no doubt inspired by Wagner's pioneering use of it, Nietzsche might have developed a Philosophy of Dissonance.  To begin with, as previously proposed here, Dissonance can be defined as a relation between Repulsion and Attraction amongst a plurality of components, a characterization that can be classified as 'descriptive', and/or stipulated as 'normative'.  Now, one advantage of such a principle is that it illuminates an important distinction in the doctrine of the Will to Power that Nietzsche never explicitly recognizes--that between powerful Repulsion and powerful Attraction, though he plainly implicitly entertains it--the resistant loner, and the form-giving conqueror, respectively.  Accordingly, he never systematizes the two expressions of Power, leaving a phenomenon such as the egalitarian aristocracy, to which he alludes in Beyond Good and Evil #259, without an adequate grounding in the Will to Power principle.  In contrast, such an important social configuration can be easily characterized in terms of Dissonance, i. e. as constituted by a relation between independence and cooperation, and, can, perhaps, be judged as an exemplary political arrangement.