Thursday, December 17, 2009

Cartesian Evolvement

Because his 'I think, therefore I am' notion initiated a trend in which concrete thinking, and no longer an abstract Universal such as God or a Platonic Form, is the measure of Philosophizing, Descartes is often considered the 'Father of Modern Philosophy'. Given that traceable to that Principle are the more general modern trends of Secularism, Humanism, and Subjectivism, he could also be considered the 'Father of Modern Civilization', which would not be honorific coming from those who regard those trends as decadent. But any characterization, even Heidegger's, of Descartes as 'Subjectivistic' is hasty if it ignores his other profound contribution to modern civilization--the 'Cartesian Plane'. This Descartes initially intended to illustrate the Arithmetization of Geometry, which went on to facilitate the quantification of Physics that is the basis of all modern Science, and which is, more commonly, the forerunner of every graph. Not only would admirers and critics alike be hard-pressed to classify this innovation of his as 'Subjectivistic', this aspect of Cartesiansim suggests an alternative interpretation of his theory of Selfhood. The fact that the significance to him of the 'I think' is its indubitability shows that its importance lies not in its Subjectivism, but in its Objectivity, i. e. no matter how hard he tries, and regardless of what he wishes, he cannot doubt the existence of 'I think'. Regardless of what trends followed Descartes, the result of his analysis is more accurately a self-Objectivization, which in Evolvementalism, is the beginning of Individuality.

2 comments:

  1. The so-called indubitability of "I think" is yet subject to and subsumed by the universal of "awareness," which is open-ended, i.e., infinite. "Thinking" is narrowed and limited by brain physiology, survival reductionism, mortality (unless your brain has been frozen along with Timothy Leary's...), materialistic and manipulated social and cultural conditioning, emotional interference, narrowed/limited world and cosmic perspectives, separation angst, etc. "I doubt" may actually be a less limiting mode of inquiry and exploration, so long as the "doubt" is a process and not simply underlain by a contra "belief". "Awareness" may be described as a co-evolution of creation/source, and the created; cosmic consciousness, and its "thinking" receptor. Civilization and individuality falsely "evolve" (actually de-volve, by nature)pursuant to lies, half-truths, verbose pedantry, and entropy, leading to untenable and unsustainable apices; not honorific in the long run by both idealistic and materialistic standards....

    ReplyDelete
  2. My neologistic terms 'Evolve' and 'Individual' have been previously defined, and are not to be confused with their standard meanings. The main point of this piece is to challenge a prevalent classification of Descartes as a 'Subjectivist', as e. g. influentially proposed by Heidegger.

    ReplyDelete